<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 50 rebrands of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/</link>
	<description>Logo design, branding, business card, flyer, brochure and graphic design portfolio. Brand identity and graphic designer working worldwide from Melbourne.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:59:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Keir</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-17279</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-17279</guid>
		<description>Vikash,

Correct, they are a digital media hardware and software company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vikash,</p>
<p>Correct, they are a digital media hardware and software company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vikash Kumar</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-17276</link>
		<dc:creator>Vikash Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 05:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-17276</guid>
		<description>Hey Andrew,
Really a nice collection. I like the &quot;Avid Technology&quot;, is this any music company? I am just asking because the logo is looking like music buttons (Fast, forword...ect).
Thanks for sharing with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Andrew,<br />
Really a nice collection. I like the &#8220;Avid Technology&#8221;, is this any music company? I am just asking because the logo is looking like music buttons (Fast, forword&#8230;ect).<br />
Thanks for sharing with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Keir</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-13719</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-13719</guid>
		<description>Hi Amanda,

A &lt;em&gt;Rebrands of 2010&lt;/em&gt; post is &lt;del datetime=&quot;2010-10-17T01:10:41+00:00&quot;&gt;in the works, so stay tuned.&lt;/del&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.andrewkeir.com/new-logo-designs-and-brand-identities-of-2010/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;available right here.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amanda,</p>
<p>A <em>Rebrands of 2010</em> post is <del datetime="2010-10-17T01:10:41+00:00">in the works, so stay tuned.</del> <a href="http://www.andrewkeir.com/new-logo-designs-and-brand-identities-of-2010/" rel="nofollow">available right here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Vlahakis</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-13706</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Vlahakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-13706</guid>
		<description>So many of these re-brands are worse aren&#039;t they.

Those that I think are vastly improved include Alberta, ChickeNow, ArmorAll, and Dick Smith.

Thanks for pulling together so many examples :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many of these re-brands are worse aren&#8217;t they.</p>
<p>Those that I think are vastly improved include Alberta, ChickeNow, ArmorAll, and Dick Smith.</p>
<p>Thanks for pulling together so many examples :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Keir</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-13009</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-13009</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,

The Hodges logo design is interesting, I&#039;ve still been seeing their old branding on signs around my area ( south Melbourne ) over the last few weeks. It must be very new.

I&#039;m about due to do a &lt;em&gt;rebrands of 2010&lt;/em&gt; blog post, I&#039;ll be sure to include it. Thanks for the tip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,</p>
<p>The Hodges logo design is interesting, I&#8217;ve still been seeing their old branding on signs around my area ( south Melbourne ) over the last few weeks. It must be very new.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m about due to do a <em>rebrands of 2010</em> blog post, I&#8217;ll be sure to include it. Thanks for the tip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lowe</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-13005</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-13005</guid>
		<description>Stumbled across your site Andrew - great articles. Just noticed Hodges changed their logo very recently.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://mtelizaart.com/library/public/image/logo/Hodges_Real_Estate.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Old logo design.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hodges.com.au/sites/hodges.com.au/files/images/hodgesnewlogo.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New logo design.&lt;/a&gt;

I&#039;m a fan of the update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stumbled across your site Andrew &#8211; great articles. Just noticed Hodges changed their logo very recently.</p>
<p><a href="http://mtelizaart.com/library/public/image/logo/Hodges_Real_Estate.png" rel="nofollow">Old logo design.</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hodges.com.au/sites/hodges.com.au/files/images/hodgesnewlogo.jpg" rel="nofollow">New logo design.</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m a fan of the update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Keir</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-4217</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-4217</guid>
		<description>Adam,
Maybe next year to completely removed the shadow from Opera.

Jackee,
The Wacom logo is a bizarre design, there&#039;s no doubt.

Sonia,
From a static logo point of view I&#039;m not a fan of the BFI design, I&#039;d be interested to see it in motion though. I imagine this is where it shines, so to speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,<br />
Maybe next year to completely removed the shadow from Opera.</p>
<p>Jackee,<br />
The Wacom logo is a bizarre design, there&#8217;s no doubt.</p>
<p>Sonia,<br />
From a static logo point of view I&#8217;m not a fan of the BFI design, I&#8217;d be interested to see it in motion though. I imagine this is where it shines, so to speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-4213</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-4213</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice that the British Films Institute&#039;s designer found a use for the &quot;lens flare&quot; effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice that the British Films Institute&#8217;s designer found a use for the &#8220;lens flare&#8221; effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackee</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-3920</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-3920</guid>
		<description>Loser of the year: Wacom.
Winner of the year: Valio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loser of the year: Wacom.<br />
Winner of the year: Valio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-3213</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-3213</guid>
		<description>Opera could have just dropped the silly space-wasting shadow. Kraft lost it, the old one is better, just modernise it. Most improved with smaller footprint and more clarity. Ruby Tuesday and Snapple are good example of this. 

But Packard Bell went wrong way.  Beats me why Xerox went to a ball.  However &#039;nickelodean&#039; is the exception, that orange goop splat is so iconic and speaks to being a fun kids brand. 

Mouse one is cute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera could have just dropped the silly space-wasting shadow. Kraft lost it, the old one is better, just modernise it. Most improved with smaller footprint and more clarity. Ruby Tuesday and Snapple are good example of this. </p>
<p>But Packard Bell went wrong way.  Beats me why Xerox went to a ball.  However &#8216;nickelodean&#8217; is the exception, that orange goop splat is so iconic and speaks to being a fun kids brand. </p>
<p>Mouse one is cute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Keir</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-2689</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-2689</guid>
		<description>Omar,
There&#039;s a few heading in that direction, you might also be interested in reading another of my posts comparing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-web-2-0-logo-designs-compared/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;50 Web 2.0 logo designs&lt;/a&gt; compared side by side with there traditional counterparts to see the really shiny stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omar,<br />
There&#8217;s a few heading in that direction, you might also be interested in reading another of my posts comparing <a href="http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-web-2-0-logo-designs-compared/" rel="nofollow">50 Web 2.0 logo designs</a> compared side by side with there traditional counterparts to see the really shiny stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-2686</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-2686</guid>
		<description>If you notice, a lot of these have gone from dull and sharp to shiny and round, I suppose it&#039;s the new &quot;Web 2.0&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you notice, a lot of these have gone from dull and sharp to shiny and round, I suppose it&#8217;s the new &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Keir</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-2535</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-2535</guid>
		<description>Ed
All valid points you raise there, I do believe though that the reason for that saying is many people do judge books by there cover, so to speak.

The initial point of contact is after all made by the visual identity alone, without any prior interactions or experiences, It&#039;s certainly best in my opinion to get this portion of your brand correct.

Thanks for the interesting train of thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed<br />
All valid points you raise there, I do believe though that the reason for that saying is many people do judge books by there cover, so to speak.</p>
<p>The initial point of contact is after all made by the visual identity alone, without any prior interactions or experiences, It&#8217;s certainly best in my opinion to get this portion of your brand correct.</p>
<p>Thanks for the interesting train of thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Silk</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-2534</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Silk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-2534</guid>
		<description>Interesting comparisons, but there is a danger in just focussing on the logo and judging the success of a re-brand on that alone. It means you ignore other ways in which a consumer interacts or experiences a brand, such as tone, behaviours or physical spaces.

Though a brand logo should act as the distillation of the brand&#039;s core idea, it is just one component that can used to express it. The old saying of, &quot;Don&#039;t judge a book by its cover&quot; for me rings true in this instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comparisons, but there is a danger in just focussing on the logo and judging the success of a re-brand on that alone. It means you ignore other ways in which a consumer interacts or experiences a brand, such as tone, behaviours or physical spaces.</p>
<p>Though a brand logo should act as the distillation of the brand&#8217;s core idea, it is just one component that can used to express it. The old saying of, &#8220;Don&#8217;t judge a book by its cover&#8221; for me rings true in this instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Keir</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkeir.com/50-rebrands-of-2009/#comment-2275</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewkeir.com/?p=3039#comment-2275</guid>
		<description>Jimbob,
I google&#039;d the old logo, I assume &lt;a href=&quot;http://reports2.equitystory.com/cgi-bin/show.ssp?companyName=commerzbank&amp;language=English&amp;report_id=gb-2008&amp;id=20&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this is it&lt;/a&gt;? I&#039;m with you, a change for the better in my opinion.

Ewan,
Except for a being lower case their old logo is much the same as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.avclub.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the A.V. Club&lt;/a&gt; logo too. Maybe next time for something original.

Terry,
The RKO logo in particular could do without it for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimbob,<br />
I google&#8217;d the old logo, I assume <a href="http://reports2.equitystory.com/cgi-bin/show.ssp?companyName=commerzbank&#038;language=English&#038;report_id=gb-2008&#038;id=20" rel="nofollow">this is it</a>? I&#8217;m with you, a change for the better in my opinion.</p>
<p>Ewan,<br />
Except for a being lower case their old logo is much the same as <a href="http://www.avclub.com/" rel="nofollow">the A.V. Club</a> logo too. Maybe next time for something original.</p>
<p>Terry,<br />
The RKO logo in particular could do without it for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.andrewkeir.com @ 2012-02-07 18:00:24 by W3 Total Cache -->
